<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Pharma Exec Blog &#187; Add new tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pharmexec.com/tag/add-new-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com</link>
	<description>The Business of Pharmaceuticals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;Advanstar Communications </copyright>
		<managingEditor>gkoroneos@advanstar.com (Advanstar Communications)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>gkoroneos@advanstar.com(Advanstar Communications)</webMaster>
		<category>Pharmceuticals</category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>pharma, pharmaceuticals, life science, business, news, pharmexec, unplugged</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Business of Pharmaceuticals</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Advanstar Communications</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine">
  <itunes:category text="Medicine"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine">
  <itunes:category text="Medicine"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Business">
  <itunes:category text="Management &amp; Marketing"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Advanstar Communications</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>gkoroneos@advanstar.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://lifeinabungalo.com/art/pharmaunplugged_300x30.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Is a Swine Flu Vaccine Backlash on the Cards?</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/07/23/is-a-swine-flu-vaccine-backlash-on-the-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/07/23/is-a-swine-flu-vaccine-backlash-on-the-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian Upton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Witty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baxter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmexec.com/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Image by The Artifex via Flickr



The risk of over-production has paid off: world orders for swine vaccines will see billions of dollars in extra revenue for the biggest pharma companies. GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, and Baxter are all expected to report very healthy first-half earnings as a result of a wealth of government contracts for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 250px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60328416@N00/3496268779"><img title="Swine Flu" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3611/3496268779_4abe34a31d_m.jpg" alt="Swine Flu" width="240" height="159" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60328416@N00/3496268779">The Artifex</a> via Flickr</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>The risk of over-production has paid off: world orders for swine vaccines will see billions of dollars in extra revenue for the biggest pharma companies. GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, and Baxter are all expected to report very healthy first-half earnings as a result of a wealth of government contracts for vaccines and antiviral medicines.</p>
<p>According to a report in the UKÂ <em><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/375dde06-7559-11de-9ed5-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Financial Times</a></em>, GSK has sold 150m doses of its pandemic flu to the UK, US, France and Belgium, and sales of Rocheâ€™s Tamiflu have been boosted by orders from the both the public and private sectors. From the US government alone,<br />
Novartis has received an order for $346 million for antigen and $343.8 million for adjuvant, a total sale of nearly $690 million. Total swine flu vaccine sales could ultimately net Novartis between $1 and $1.5 billion.<span id="more-935"></span></p>
<p>But, ahead of the publication of the company financial reports, there already seems to be indications of potential backlash about pharma&#8217;s return on investment with regard to the swine flu orders. In the UK media, GSK has already been obliged to justify the price of approx. Â£6 per dose that it has set for its vaccine, with CEO Andrew Witty explaining: &#8220;We&#8217;ve deliberately been very responsible about pricing â€” the vaccine is not being sold at a special premium&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The pandemic has been saturating the UK news much more than in other countries; in the US, it has featured nowhere near as prominently on the agenda. The UK media is notorious for turning against those that it previously championed. One wonders, then, whether this price-based backlash is likely to spiral over the coming months, as the vaccines finally hit the market.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very possible, in the UK at least, that the knights in shining pharma that promised to come to the swine flu rescue just a few weeks ago could be soon be subject to the wrong kind of press attention â€” once again!</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f9745a66-0f97-4d5e-9ebc-20272276551c/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f9745a66-0f97-4d5e-9ebc-20272276551c" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/07/23/is-a-swine-flu-vaccine-backlash-on-the-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roche Unsweetens Genentech Pot and Takes it to the Shareholders</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/01/30/roche-unsweetens-genentech-pot-and-takes-it-to-the-shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/01/30/roche-unsweetens-genentech-pot-and-takes-it-to-the-shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Koroneos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genentech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoffmannâ€“La Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutley  New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmexec.com/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Image by Getty Images via Daylife



Roche wants Genentech and it&#8217;s sick of waiting for a deal.
Six months after a special committee for the biotech firm&#8217;s board of directors rejected Roche&#8217;s offer of $43.7 billion or $89 a share, Roche has switched gears and dropped the offer to $86.50 per share and is taking negotiations to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.daylife.com/image/095neyu7RS2uS?utm_source=zemanta&amp;utm_medium=p&amp;utm_content=095neyu7RS2uS&amp;utm_campaign=z1"><img title="SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JULY 14:  A sign is ..." src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/095neyu7RS2uS/150x100.jpg" alt="SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JULY 14:  A sign is ..." width="150" height="100" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image by <a href="http://www.daylife.com/source/Getty_Images">Getty Images</a> via <a href="http://www.daylife.com">Daylife</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Roche wants Genentech and it&#8217;s sick of waiting for a deal.</p>
<p>Six months after a special committee for the biotech firm&#8217;s board of directors rejected Roche&#8217;s offer of $43.7 billion or $89 a share, Roche has switched gears and dropped the offer to $86.50 per share and is taking negotiations to the stockholders.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are disappointed that the discussions over the last six months between Roche and the special committee of Genentech have not produced a negotiated agreement,&#8221; Roche Chairman Franz B. Humer stated in a <a href="http://www.roche.com/media/media_releases/med-cor-2009-01-30.htm" target="_blank">release</a>. &#8220;We feel it is now time to give the Genentech minority shareholders the opportunity to decide on our offer. Especially in the current market environment the offer provides an opportunity for all public shareholders to achieve liquidity and to receive a fair price for all their shares.â€</p>
<p>Roche already owns 55 percent of Genentech and hopes to snag full control of its top cancer treatment Avastin. When the deal is approved, Roche plans to leave Genentech&#8217;s R&amp;D division as a stand alone unit based in San Francisco. Meanwhile, Roche&#8217;s Nutley, New Jersey-based pharma commercial operations and Palto Alto-based virology division would be transplanted to SF. The Nutley branch will not be shuttered, instead it&#8217;s going to be turned into ground zero for Roche&#8217;s disease biology and metabolism units.</p>
<p>Roche plans to pay for the aquisition merger using a combination of cash, loans, and bonds.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=4309b788-b447-4ab2-a86b-baca4483bc1b" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2009/01/30/roche-unsweetens-genentech-pot-and-takes-it-to-the-shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

