PharmExec Blog

Pharmacists: The Other White Coats

Patients in search of face time with a healthcare provider are stopping into their local drugstores, where consultations are free and the wait time is shorter. Pharmacists are in a unique position, too, to move the needle on drug adherence.

Despite an ever-expanding digital medium, with new channels for conversation and new collections of disease-related information popping up all the time, patients still prize face-to-face interaction with experts. According to recent research conducted by McKesson, 72% of patients cite doctors as the top source for information related to their conditions. The internet comes in second, at 54%, followed by pharmacists at 44%.

Physicians may have time to give patients a rough overview of their disease, but discussions around the importance of drug adherence are lacking. Patients who don’t adhere to their medication regimen – an ongoing and multifactorial problem that not only drives up healthcare costs due to unnecessary hospitalizations, but also punches holes in drug sales – are often not getting the kind of instruction from their physicians that could help move the needle on adherence.

“We know from talking to physicians that they aren’t really armed and able to have those conversations around adherence,” says Derek Rago, VP marketing and strategy at McKesson. “Physicians get detailed on a product, but they don’t get detailed on the specific barriers that patients may face when taking the medication.”

Enter the pharmacist, whom Rago calls “the most trusted advisor in the healthcare continuum.” The role of the pharmacist is changing as patients, shooed out of their doctor’s offices, require more instruction on managing chronic conditions, and dealing with the associated challenges of staying on a medication. To address this need, McKesson, on behalf of its pharma clients, has recruited pharmacists working in retail pharmacies to become behavioral coaches, and to discuss adherence issues with patients on their first and second prescription fill. Participating pharmacists are trained to provide “behavioral coaching sessions” which, in the case of a diabetes program for one client, led to an additional four prescriptions dispensed over 12 months, says Rago. By speaking directly with individual patients, pharmacists can ascertain the barriers to adherence, and accentuate the positives of a medication regimen. “We’ll say, ‘what did your doctor tell you about the medication and what you can expect?’ Then we know what they’ve already been told, so we can properly inform them in a very positive way, and see if they have the conviction and belief that they can stay on medication,” says Rago. Patients can then be segmented and engaged differently based on different needs.

Whether or not they’re a part of McKesson’s network of behavioral coaches, pharmacists in general are playing a more active role in patient care, according to recent Manhattan Research survey data. Of the 752 US pharmacists surveyed, roughly two-fifths said they spend more time providing care and support for patients than they did two years ago. Seventy-five percent of the pharmacists surveyed said they wanted access to online patient education materials from pharma.

Just a few years ago, retail pharmacies fretted over the emergence of mail-order pharmacy, and the large pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) that hoped (and still hope) to convert their patients to mail order, a cost-saver for PBMs. But for the second year in a row, consumer satisfaction with mail-order pharmacy has declined, according to J.D. Power report released in late September. “Customer service is becoming an increasingly important advantage of the brick and mortar pharmacy experience,” said Rick Miller, senior director of the healthcare practice at J.D. Power and Associates, in a release on the survey data. The study also found that 37% of customers using in-store pharmacies are asked if they’d like to speak with a pharmacist, up from 35% in 2011.

Technology shouldn’t be discounted of course; with a rise in ePrescribing, and the ongoing adoption of electronic health records, pharmaceutical companies will be able to deliver co-pay assistance to patients through their prescribing physicians – docs can pin digital co-pay coupons to an ePrescription, for example – with less of a hassle. And all of this tech-enabled automation is freeing up pharmacists to spend even more time working the floor.

“Newer pharmacists coming through the system are more clinically educated, and they have the highest frequency of patient interaction” among HCPs, says Rago. Those bricks and mortar pharmacies eying the future are “moving the pharmacist from the back of the store to the front, because they think that’s what will differentiate them in terms of the pharmacy business as a whole,” he says.

This entry was posted in compliance, E-Media, healthcare, Patient Communication, patient compliance, patient education, social media, Technology and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

3 Comments

  1. Michael Schwartz
    Posted November 8, 2012 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Pharma companies would do well to find a way to compensate pharmacists for their activity in consulting with patients on adherence. We calculated that this could mean up to billions of added sales for some pharmaceuticals (statins are but one good example). There is considerable evidence that consultation by the pharmacist can reduce non-adherence to very low levels.
    Michael A Schwartz, PhD
    Dean Emeritus, University of Florida
    College of Pharmacy

  2. Posted November 23, 2012 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Ben,

    Great article. Thanks for spotlighting this important trend. To this, I would add three observations. First, not only can pharmacists help when there is a lack of adherence, but they are as valuable in cases where there is 100% adherence if the patient is taking multiple drugs. The potential downside of the patient taking all of her or his prescribed meds is that drug interactions can arise that the physician could not have anticipate or was not aware of. The pharmacist is the best line of defense for over medication and unsafe drug combinations. Second, as Derek alludes to at the end, some innovative companies like Walgreens are actually physically removing the pharmacists from behind the counter and placing them at an desk that extends into the retail floor. These kinds of changes to the physical plant will undoubtedly increase the role of pharmacists as one of the most trusted advisors in the healthcare continuum. Third, this all points to the need for the life sciences industry to continue encouraging collaboration among the key parts of the healthcare ecosystem: (i) patients, (ii) providers, (iii) payers, (iv) pharmaceuticals, (v) pharmacies, and (vi) policy-makers.

    James J. Gillespie, PhD, JD
    President & CEO
    Center for Healthcare Innovation

  3. Dino Dibella R. Ph.
    Posted November 26, 2012 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    It is important to add that the patient will see the pharmacist more than any other health care professional providing they are using not using mail order pharmacies. It is not by accident that the pharmacist is trusted so highly. The monthly visit to the pharmacy over the years build a bond between patient and pharmacist that lasts a lifetime. Very few independent or chain pharmacists leave their permanent location. Within 2 years my experience was I knew at least 80% of all regular patients on sight, knew their disease state and learned the best way to communicate with them.

    Adherence, drug interactions, allergies, helping a prenatal mom or a family with a new born or even which OTC item to select are all critical roles of the pharmacist. A continued and more collaborative position for the pharmacist is critical for the optimal health care of the patient..

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Categories

  • Meta