Categories
Tags
Abbott Advertising AstraZeneca Barack Obama Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals Breast cancer Bristol Myers Squibb business Cancer Clinical trial Conditions and Diseases Deal Eli Lilly European Commission European Union FDA Food and Drug Administration Genentech generics GlaxoSmithKline Google GSK HBA Health Health care Johnson & Johnson layoffs Lilly Margaret Hamburg Marketing Merck Novartis Pfizer Pharma Pharmaceutical drug pharmaceutical industry Research and development Roche Sanofi-Aventis Schering Plough social media Twitter U.S. Food and Drug Administration United States Wyeth
Technology News
BioPharm News- Shire Gains European Approval for its Gaucher Disease Treatment
- Mtech Bioprocess Scale-Up Facility to Double in Staff and Size
- ImClone Closes Plant in New Jersey, Consolidating Erbitux Manufacture
- EMA and FDA Seek Applicants for Joint GMP Inspections
- ATMI Expands Bloomington, Minnesota Manufacturing Facility
Clinical Trials News- CRF Health Achieves EXACT ePRO Vendor Certification for Windows Mobile Systems
- ACR Image Metrix Establishes Global Presence
- BioPharm Systems Named to the 2010 Inc. 500|5000 List of Fastest-Growing Companies in the U.S.
- CRF Health Doubles North American Headquarters
- Oracle Completes Acquisition of Phase Forward
Blogroll
-
Meta

Europe: Go Easy on Your Pharma Lobbyists
European pharmaceutical executives are sometimes heard to complain that their public affairs departments are not doing a good job for them, and that their industry associations are a waste of time and money.
A report published in Brussels earlier this month suggests that this judgment may be excessively harsh. Lobbyists for healthcare and pharmaceuticals score very high in the study of perceptions among politicians and senior officials in European Union institutions and member states. And industry associations score particularly highly.
Another feather for the cap of drug industry lobbyists is that they are considered to be doing a better job than lobbyists from non-governmental organizations in the healthcare sector. The report “points to a perception of greater industry effectiveness across all sectors,” and “in many cases (including energy, and healthcare and pharmaceuticals) the perceived gap in favor of industry is substantial.”
In addition, the report from Burson Marsteller’s Brussels office says: “Trade associations are seen overall as the most effective lobbyists,” followed by companies, non-governmental organizations and public affairs consultancies, and only then by think-tanks and law firms.
Lobbyists for healthcare and pharmaceuticals score very highly in a study of perceptions among politicians and senior officials in European Union institutions and member states. And industry associations score particularly highly.
Overall, the healthcare and the pharmaceutical sector come in second (after the energy sector), scoring 7.14 out of 10, on a scale where 0 is “very poor” and 10 is “very good.”
It does even better at national level in some countries, including Austria, France, and Germany. Much lower scores were achieved by consumer goods, food and drink, agriculture, transport, financial services, IT and telecommunications, chemicals, mining and natural resources, utilities and public services, and retail.
Among non-governmental organizations, healthcare and pharmaceuticals organizations do best — but their overall effectiveness rating is only 61 percent. In some countries they score better: pharmaceutical lobbying by non-governmental organizations wins 84 percent approval in Germany and Spain, and 77 percent in France.
One of the findings of the report is that politicians and officials are increasingly concerned about transparency — they want lobbyists to be clear about whom they are representing, and clear about what their positions are.
It should be interesting to see quite how well they fare.
Reflector