<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is FDA Watching YouTube?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pharmexec.com/2008/10/10/is-fda-watching-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2008/10/10/is-fda-watching-youtube/</link>
	<description>The Business of Pharmaceuticals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:09:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watching YouTube &#187; FDA is Watching YouTube for Illegal Drug Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2008/10/10/is-fda-watching-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-24924</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching YouTube &#187; FDA is Watching YouTube for Illegal Drug Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmexec.com/?p=302#comment-24924</guid>
		<description>[...] from the PhamaExec Blog: &#8220;Shire [ a drug company] received a warning letter for posting a sponsored testimonial on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the PhamaExec Blog: &#8220;Shire [ a drug company] received a warning letter for posting a sponsored testimonial on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2008/10/10/is-fda-watching-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-16311</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmexec.com/?p=302#comment-16311</guid>
		<description>As a matter of policy, just to avoid some unintended consequences of what employees might put of these social networking sites, I suggest that their IT departments block access from computers inside the organization&#039;s network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a matter of policy, just to avoid some unintended consequences of what employees might put of these social networking sites, I suggest that their IT departments block access from computers inside the organization&#8217;s network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fard Johnmar</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmexec.com/2008/10/10/is-fda-watching-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Fard Johnmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmexec.com/?p=302#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>George: 

Very interesting.  My feeling is let&#039;s not make a mountain out of a molehill.  Clearly, FDA is going to monitor any media channel pharma is using to promote its products.  It&#039;s important to focus on content, not context when evaluating the regulatory risks of specific marketing initiatives.  For more on this topic, please see my blog post about the Shire warning letter here: http://tinyurl.com/3v4obc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: </p>
<p>Very interesting.  My feeling is let&#8217;s not make a mountain out of a molehill.  Clearly, FDA is going to monitor any media channel pharma is using to promote its products.  It&#8217;s important to focus on content, not context when evaluating the regulatory risks of specific marketing initiatives.  For more on this topic, please see my blog post about the Shire warning letter here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3v4obc." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3v4obc.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
