PharmExec Blog

Tweeting to Your Facebook: Why Pharma Is So Bad With Social Media

Zemoga CEO DJ Edgerton

DJ Edgerton

For those of you who didn’t know, it’s Social Media Week. Granted, the week is almost over, but the panel that you all care about didn’t take place until yesterday afternoon here in NYC.

The panel’s mouthful of a name—“Navigating Social Media & New Technology in Healthcare & Pharmaceutical Industries”—is nevertheless an accurate description of the discussion. Perspectives ranged from physicians (one Jay Parkinson, who essentially started his practice with Google Calendar and an iPhone) to Big Pharma marketers (Ned Russell of Saatchi Wellness).

DJ Edgerton (pictured), CEO of digital creative firm Zemoga said pharma is really dragging its feet on the social media issue because of compliance and liability. “The number one driver of social media in pharma is adverse event reporting,” he said. “So they’re disabling their Facebook walls, not interacting with the community, because they’re afraid.” Which, he added, defeats the purpose of social media.

Of course, once the industry finally does go beyond just dipping a toe in this pool, the implications are revolutionary. Russell and Parkinson foresee the disappearance of the traditional “brand.” Instead, “campaigns” will focus on patient education, possibly directing consumers to the new KOLs—their peers.

Even now, pharma brands have little or no traction in the social media world. While consumer products like sneakers and Slim Jims thrive, as Parkinson pointed out: “No one wants to ‘friend’ Lipitor.” Those who follow companies or brands on Twitter are almost exclusively people in the industry or connected to it. In exchange for real online “patronage” (so to speak), companies need to offer some real value—most likely in the form of information.

Edgerton had some pretty powerful closing advice for the industry: “Be not afraid.” The biggest mistake a company can make right now is to ignore social media. Take the risk and reap the rewards.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share
Posted in E-Media, Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Will Europe Stay Coy on Information to Patients?

EU-flag2Guest blog by Reflector, Pharm Exec Europe’s Brussels correspondent.

American drug firms have been pushing for it for years, and so — in an entirely different direction — has the European Parliament. Patient groups are divided over whether it’s needed. The European Commission (EC) says it’s definitely time for action. But EU member states — and many European drug firms — are happy to see it crumble to dust.

“It” is draft legislation on information to the public about prescription drugs. Everyone recognizes that the internet has changed the entire drug information game — feeding the appetites of growing numbers of people who want to be more involved in their own healthcare. So, over a year ago the EC proposed to update Europe’s creaking rulebook, which currently forbids drug firms initiating any communication with the public on prescription products. Read More »

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Strategy | Leave a comment

A Few Words About Diversification

Guest blog by Dr Brian White, an analyst at Shore Capital.

As a result of the feared impact of the patent expiry cliff, the decimation of branded sales by multi-sourced generics and the obstacles erected, especially by managed care in the US, to slow the uptake of branded pharmaceuticals where a generic in the same class is available, industry players have responded by diluting their reliance on the “small white pill” to embrace a hybrid model combining pharmaceuticals with diagnostics, a consumer health business, animal health and even generics.

This strategy at the very least diversifies revenue sources away from pure pharmaceuticals. While animal health and diagnostics should be relatively defensive, we suspect that consumer health and nutritionals could ultimately be even less immune from the economic cycle than pharmaceuticals. Diagnostics is also benefiting from strong product innovation with new components of growth in areas such as in vitro and molecular diagnostics. Read More »

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Europe, Global, Guest Blog, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AstraZeneca to Slash 8,000 More Jobs (Updated 2/3/10)

Last year, AstraZeneca announced the elimination of some 15,000 jobs. Last Thursday, the London-based company revealed that it plans to lay off another 8,000 by 2014—this despite global revenue growth of 4 percent for 2009.

Much of the drive for this addition labor sculpting stems from AZ’s desire to streamline its R&D; the company will focus on fewer disease targets and expects to cut up to 3,500 jobs in that sector, which currently employs about 12,000.

But it’s not all bad news. Some jobs might survive via relocation, and because the company wants to expand its work in biologics, the net loss could end up in the 1,800 range. This should save AZ at least $1 billion a year, money they need for pipeline projects close to launch, such as the highly anticipated motavisumab, which aims to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. AstraZeneca’s pipeline contains over 100 projects, about 30 percent of which were acquired by licensing, according to CEO David Brennan.

The company has not disclosed which disease areas it will leave behind during this streamlining process, but it’s unlikely they’ll drop ones diabetes (with seven compounds in the works and a rapidly growing patient population) or cancer.

According to the Times of London, GlaxoSmithKline is also expected to have unpleasant news for employees during Thursday’s release of its 4Q figures: They’ll be cutting 4,000 jobs, mostly in Europe and America. A similar bloodletting took place last February, when an estimated 6,000 got the axe. This is all part of Glaxo’s plan to save $2.7 billion by 2011.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share
Posted in Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Novartis Names Jimenez CEO

Joe Jimenez

Joe Jimenez

Novartis shocked investors on Tuesday morning when the Swiss-based firm announced that CEO Daniel Vasella would relinquish his post as CEO to Joe Jimenez while retaining his chairman of the board spot.

According to a release, this move has been in the works since 2008 and lead to the restructuring of its management team. The executive committee has decreased in size from 12 to nine members, and the company eliminated three senior positions, including chief operating officer, head corporate affairs, and head group quality/technical operations.

Jimenez is no stranger to the company. He’s served as pharmaceutical head for three years and held a laundry list of senior level positions at consumer companies, such as Heinz and Clorox. His previous pharma experience consists of a five-year tenure at AstraZeneca from 2002 to 2007.

While Vasella continues to draw a paycheck from Novartis three people are heading for different pastures. COO Joerg Reinhardt, a frontrunner for the CEO slot, is calling it a day; as are CFO Raymond Breu and Quality Group leader Andreas Rummelt.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share
Posted in Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment